Massive Attack call for government plan to cut live music’s carbon emissions
Band commissioned report on industry’s footprint and criticise ministers for not doing enough
A plan to ensure the live music industry meets climate targets needs to be urgently introduced by the government, according to the band Massive Attack, which commissioned a report on carbon emissions in the music business.
While the report by the University of Manchester recommends rock stars should take some responsibility, ditching private jets and reducing the amount of kit they bring on tour, Massive Attack’s Rob Del Naja, otherwise known as 3D, criticised the government for not doing enough to support the industry to reduce carbon emissions.
He said: “Where’s the industrial plan for the scale of the transformation that’s required for the UK economy and society? It doesn’t seem to exist.
“The live music industry, especially after Brexit, is so important to national identity and self-esteem. It’s one of the few areas you could describe as genuinely world-class and has a vast social and economic value, as well-reported, generating over GBP4.6bn for the economy every year and employing thousands of dedicated people.
“But where is the government planning to support the rate of adaption we’re going to need to hit compatibility with [the Paris agreement]? It doesn’t seem to exist. The data [from the report] is not surprising, it’s the strategy that’s missing here.”
Massive Attack have been carbon offsetting for years but had recently become disillusioned by its impact, Del Naja said, describing it as a way for fossil fuel companies to pass on the responsibility to consumers.
Instead, the band have taken measures to plan future tours around reducing their impact on the climate, including recommendations from the report, such as travelling by train where possible, building more easily transportable sets, using local providers and encouraging the use of green energy.
Del Naja said commissioning the research back in 2019 was about understanding how the live music industry could actually reduce carbon emissions, rather than simply mitigating against damage to the climate.
He said: “We looked at our last tour and thought, you know, we’ve allocated x amount of money based on the calculation of the carbon we produced in the tour in 2018.
“And then it was like, are we just going to go on another offset, or should we do something a little bit more interesting and radical? The proposition to go to [the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research at the University of Manchester] was suggested to us and we thought that would be a good thing to do, because how many times have we sat in an interview and said we would love to do something but we don’t know what to do?
“And we’re messaging the fact that there’s a climate catastrophe out there but we don’t know what to do about it.”
Prof Carly McLachlan, who led the research which modelled ways the industry could work to meet carbon targets, said the report was about “bringing together a sense of the scale and urgency” of the work that needed to be done and trying to set new industry standards.
“We’ve been met with a lot of enthusiasm in the sector and lots of [artists] are already doing lots of it. When people make a lot of those adaptations it starts to become normal practice, for example, to think about routing a tour from a carbon point of view.”
She said she hoped the report would be a catalyst for people working in and around the live music industry. She said: “Basically, as is the case with much climate action, we actually know what we need to do, we just need to get on with doing it.”